Previous Page  13 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 13 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

F

noise emissions and the power con-

sumption of the rotor can be positi-

vely influenced by this method. Con-

ventional (collective and cyclic) heli-

copter controls cannot effectively in-

fluence the higher harmonics of the

undesired aerodynamic effects, and

are only used to control the flight

attitude. This is why as early as the

mid-20th century, researchers tried

to counter such phenomena and their

effects by means of active rotor con-

trol. In addition to the pitch angle

changes at all blades that are imple-

mented by the primary controls, ac-

tive rotor control introduces high-

frequency pitch angle changes at a

certain multiple of the rotor frequency

(rotor-harmonic frequencies). This sig-

nificantly reduces the vibrations in the

helicopter and the noise radiation,

and can also improve thrust and lift.

Active Rotor Control

Existing approaches to active rotor

control often have significant draw-

backs. Systems that create the dyna-

mic pitch angle changes by moving

the swashplate (through actuators)

are individual-blade-control (IBC)-

capable only for rotors with up to 3

blades. For rotors with four or more

blades, as are common today, this

approach is limited for reasons of

swashplate kinematics. Other systems

are fully IBC-capable but use actua-

tors in the rotating system that are

subject to high loads and have to be

supplied with energy and control sig-

nals via slip rings, which can pose a

major challenge in and of itself.

DLR test setup for developing active controls for helicopter rotors.

DLR BRAUNSCHWEIG

or a helicopter in forward flight,

the flows resulting from the for-

ward movement of the helicop-

ter and the rotation of the rotor bla-

des overlap. This creates highly un-

symmetrical flow conditions within

the rotor disk. This causes various aero-

dynamic, aeroelastic and aeroacous-

tic effects, such as dynamic stall, noise,

and vibrations. These effects usually

occur periodically with the rotor’s ro-

tational frequency and integer multip-

les thereof (rotor-harmonic frequen-

cies). One approach to counter or at

least mitigate these effects focuses di-

rectly on the helicopter’s rotor controls.

Controlling the Helicopter

The main mechanical control unit of a

helicopter is called a swashplate. It

transfers the pilot’s commands to the

rotating blades. This is done by a com-

bination of collective pitch control,

i.e., changing the pitch angle of all

main rotor blades to change the lift,

and cyclic pitch control to influence

forward and sideward thrust. The lat-

ter causes a variation of the blades’

pitch angles to occur once every revo-

lution of the rotor, or 1/rev.

Taking Action

To mitigate undesired effects, the pitch

angles of the rotor blades can be modi-

fied by stimulating the rotor blades

with an integer multiple of the rotor

frequency and a low amplitude. To re-

duce vibrations, the frequency, ampli-

tude, and phase of the control signal

is chosen such that vibrations are can-

celed out by interference. But also

>>

PAGE

13

Source: © DLR

dSPACE Magazine 1/2016 · © dSPACE GmbH, Paderborn, Germany ·

info@dspace.com

·

www.dspace.com